Conservative. Liberal. Something of a surprise revelation and an accompanying observation was made Sunday as a group of leaders gathered to discuss Tim Keller‘s, Generous Justice, at Snow Hill. Yes, I know. Yesterday I mentioned my friends reading Jacob Taubes and today I note a group where I pastor is reading Keller. So much for polarities, dualities, and binaries.
Keller, in chapter 4, remarks about the way conservatives and liberals have played their respective emphases as well as their dimunitions. He argues for a more complete, or whole, vision when it comes to the way we understand human matters he categorizes under the rubric of justice. A move I like except for the pejorative way “social” is often added to justice by conservatives as if in the Scriptures the call of YHWH for deference to the poor, stranger, and widow can somehow be construed as non-social. Reading Keller’s thoughts stirred some to re-think the way we flippantly toss about conservative and liberal as a means to pigeon-hole people. Words often constitute code language. Each group has their attendant vocabulary to distinguish “us” from “them.” A move which makes conversation’s first move one of winning and losing rather than understanding.
Continue Reading »












“Code Language” – Powers Behaving Badly
Keller, in chapter 4, remarks about the way conservatives and liberals have played their respective emphases as well as their dimunitions. He argues for a more complete, or whole, vision when it comes to the way we understand human matters he categorizes under the rubric of justice. A move I like except for the pejorative way “social” is often added to justice by conservatives as if in the Scriptures the call of YHWH for deference to the poor, stranger, and widow can somehow be construed as non-social. Reading Keller’s thoughts stirred some to re-think the way we flippantly toss about conservative and liberal as a means to pigeon-hole people. Words often constitute code language. Each group has their attendant vocabulary to distinguish “us” from “them.” A move which makes conversation’s first move one of winning and losing rather than understanding.
Read the full article »