Top

Untaming the wild and enabling the radical …

May 31, 2006


A friend recommended the novel, Gilead. A father is writing something of a memoir to his son. The father is a pastor. We often talk about taking this life of following Jesus seriously. We must admit we seem to have “tamed” the wild and “softened” the radical way of the Kingdom. I read the following passage from Gilead and thought it striking at the heart of a reckless following needed for our day; something to curb our penchant for accumulation.

I have had a certain acquaintance with a kind of holy poverty. My grandfather never kept anything that was worth giving away, or let us keep it either, so my mother said. He would take laundry right off the line. She said he was worse than any thief, worse than a house fire. She said she could probably go to any town in the Middle West and see some pair of pants she’d patched walking by in the street. I believe he was a saint of some kind. When someone remarked in his hearing that he had lost an eye in the Civil War, he said, “I prefer to remember that I have kept one.” My mother said it was good to know there was anything he could keep. He told me once he was wounded at Wilson’s Creek, on the day of the death of General Lyon. “Now that,” he said, “was a loss.”

When he left us, we all felt his absence bitterly. But he did make things difficult. It was an innocence in him. He lacked patience for anything but the plainest of interpretations of the starkest commandments, “To him who asks, give,” in particular. ( p.31)

Striking images …

May 30, 2006

I met Jim about 10 years ago. We struck up an immediate mutual admiration society. He was about 77. We met just a short time after my maternal grandfather passed away. He and Faye, his wife, took a liking to our two girls in an instant. Our oldest quickly dubbed him, “Grandpa Jim.”

creede.jpgWe sat and listened to the story of building the home in which Jim and Faye shared. He loved to garden, the tractor was a sure place for reflection. A large tree shaded nearly their entire front lawn. One day we had stopped by to chat and he described the process involved in planting and nurturing “fescue” in a climate not really conducive to the cool blades of grass this variety would sprout. Summers were given to trips to Southfork and Creede in Colorado. Jim enjoyed sitting along the Rio Grande fishing for trout. He loved the outdoors.

Jim battled several forms of cancer. His body bore the brunt of treatment, his heart became very weak. Just last month a test revealed the news - a heart that pumped at about 30%. Certain inevitabilities come with that kind of information. The doctor assured Jim and Faye he could do what he wanted but would need to pay attention to his heart. There was no treatment - the cancer treatment the likely culprit in this diagnosis.

Monday a week ago Jim left this place for the place Jesus promised. His leaving created for me a striking image. People spend lots of money creating visuals to convince us we need the latest product. I am not sure you could do better than Jim in his leaving. Here is a bit of what I shared at his Memorial Celebration last Friday.

Certain images stick in our mind. I admire those who can capture a thought or truth visually. We can give Daniel or Andrew, out audio-visual gurus, an idea and they are able to translate that visually; it is very powerful.

Jim left us with a powerful image. Certainly we should remember his persevering spirit. We ought to emulate his doing that moved him beyond just hearing. The image I want to leave you with is one Jim did not intend. I have thought about this since Monday evening when Faye was sharing with me the events of the late afternoon. You may have heard the story but did you catch the picture?

Before the local news was over and the world news had come on Jim went to move the hen off the roost and check for eggs. He was doing something he enjoyed. The outdoors held an attraction. A few years ago I recall him telling me about his diligence to grow fescue in his front yard. Talk about work! He loved to sit along the Rio Grande and fish for trout. The tractor was certainly a place of reflection. The garden his joy.

Jim did not make it back to the house. But, in his pocket were two eggs he gathered. Eggs have always been a symbol of life. Jim stared death down a number of times. He could do so because he understood his hero had defeated death. This family understood hero. Leon shared with me last evening he was near certain everyone in the family had been helped by Jim. Jesus was Jim’s hero.

Today we celebrate life. Death is swallowed up in life and the eggs in Jim’s pocket serve as a powerful reminder that we come to this place with a confident hope because of the Resurrection of Jesus.

This striking image lingers for me …

An illustration of a clarifying conversation … Oh, for more of the same …

May 24, 2006

My previous post noted my response to my friend, J.D. Greear. I note friend to highlight the following e-mail exchange regarding my previous post,

Todd, can‚Äôt seem to sign in again to your blog. I‚Äôm sure it is a user error on my part. [text with j.d.’s personal e-mail omitted]

Perhaps it was vindictive for some of the personalities involved. It certainly wasn’t for me, and I don’t believe it was for you (since you didn’t agree anyway!) The only way your apology seems to apply is if there was a common motivation in every representative that voted. Otherwise, you are simply apologizing for sins you did not commit. Or, you are implying that the Convention as a whole had the motivation of which you apologized. I’m not offended, but you seem to implicate me in your response, and though God alone knows my heart, I do not believe that was my motivation.

I know there are certain things which conscientious Christians cannot link arms with. I cannot join hands with a CBF brother knowing that on his other hand is a soteriological pluralist who advocates homosexuality. And I don’t believe that is hyperbole; a CBF pastor less than 3 miles from my church is an activist on both accounts. I cannot give any money that would go to that guy to promote

For this reason, I believe we had to pull out of the BWA. I voted my conscience. If one day I become convinced I am wrong, I will apologize for it. But I do believe I voted my conscience.

Anyway, hope to see you in Greensboro. There are, of course, no hard feelings about this, I just wanted to be clear.

Feel free to post this, I just couldn’t do it from my home computer.

Hello J.D.,

Glad for your response. I certainly wish I did not have to use a login for my blog but comment spam can be quite tasteless.

I will update my response with a clear separation of the quotes noted as not being yours. I apologize if anyone may have inferred from the post that you were the source. I have no doubt you did not vote to dissociate from the BWA for vindictive reasons. I do feel very strongly things were set in motion long before you came on the General Council that would eventually lead to the decision. My series of posts that precipitated the one to which you replied located the reason for my apology by virtue of my association as a Southern Baptist. I thought long and hard about just how I fit into the whole scheme of things and consider myself, whether I like it or not, an extension of the decisions the Convention makes. I could have easily apologized for the boycott of Disney, and maybe it would have been less sensitive an issue.

Many have had a difficult time with the idea of apologizing for sins not committed. When the Southern Baptist Convention apologized for its racial positions of the past, many who voted for that resolution (I was one of those) did not participate in those sins. Yet, with a resounding voice we apologized for the ‚Äúsins of our fathers.‚Äù When I read that just today Matthew 18 “may have been“(changed from the original to reflect that i was not at the meeting but also read here) flaunted by the Chairman of the IMB Board of Trustees ‚Äì one who claims to stand on inerrant, infallible Scriptures, I believe I must apologize to Wade Burleson. I did not sin against Wade, but that is the action of the IMB which receives our support.

I understand your conviction regarding the CBF pastor down the road. I do not think this representative of the CBF any more than I believe every Southern Baptist is vindictive. My caution comes when I am willing to pitch the whole out for one of its parts. Adopting that approach, I would on occasion have to pitch the SBC. If poor theology is the measure for cooperation rest assured there is plenty of bad theology within the SBC; and I am not excluding what you describe in the CBF pastor. Not sure how you will read that last sentence. I am suggesting there is likely at least one pastor in the SBC who fits what you describe in your CBF pastor illustration.

Let me reiterate my past sentiments regarding you and your wife. You two share a genuine understanding of hospitality. I experienced this first hand in Spain. Our brief time getting to know one another gave me a great sense of you integrity and character. I believe you voted your conscience and am glad you did. I am glad you were not offended for that was not my intent to offend you. Dialogue is the only way forward and I am glad to share in the work of the Kingdom with you and come to differing conclusions on this issue. I desperately hope this kind of camaraderie around the Gospel increases among our younger leaders like yourself. Otherwise I do feel a continued “McCarthy” styled hunt by those who desire uniformity rather than unity.

I too hope to see you in Greensboro.

Blessings.

Todd

Response to J.D. Greear … UPDATE

May 23, 2006

J.D. left a comment on my post, “My apology … Count me in … Memphis on my mind …”. I left a reply offering an e-mail dialogue. I attempted to call J.D. yesterday but he was unavailable. I do not believe J.D. is avoiding me or the issue. We are both busy and some days we have more time than others to attend to these kinds of things. J.D. is a sharp young man and as I have noted before very hospitable. I also noted in my reply to J.D. I was glad he would be nominated as a V.P. in Greensboro.

I thought I would offer my reply for my readers. J.D. asked if I thought the SBC withdrawal from the BWA represented a,

“way of getting back at the CBF. The implication is you thought it was kind of a catty, childish response.”

I am not sure I would have used these words but J.D. indeed expressed my sentiment.

He also asked in what I mistakenly thought was a duplicate comment,

“What would make you say that?”

J.D. may remember the conversation in which the following statements were made [These comments were NOT made by J.D. Greear.]

“If they are in, we are out.”

and,

“You don’t know what they have done to some of us.”

These two statements represent “to me” a vindictive motivation. That may well communicate a catty and childish behavior.

“Do you see the vision, Todd?” … Golden …

May 21, 2006

The conversation twisted and turned; a mix of information and passion. “One million AIDS orphans in the Valley of a Thousand Hills in Kwa-Zulu Natal.” “We can change the world, Todd!” “Kwa-Zulu Natal is the epicenter of the AIDS pandemic.” “We hold the hope for these people in the palm of our hands!”

Thursday afternoon Heather and Patrick Reynolds arrived at the “beach shack.” The “beach shack” is Spencer’s affectionate name for the home he shares with his wife Lisa and children Alden and Grace; just a few blocks from the ocean in Newport Beach, CA. Lisa worked on a wonderful dinner while I sat and listened to Heather talk about life and serving in South Africa.

I first heard Heather, who founded “God’s Golden Acre” (and the new website), at Soularize in Minneapolis a few years ago. She spoke Thursday as she did then. Convinced Christians possess the resources to not only affect change but to bring about systemic revolution to lives racked by AIDS, Heather challenged us to think beyond food. Her dreams remain today.

After dinner and more about life in South Africa, Heather looked at me and in her South African accent asked candidly, “Do you see the vision, Todd?” At Snow Hill we continue to move our thinking in ways we may be a blessing to the world by living out the gospel of Jesus. Future opportunities to partner with Heather and God’s Golden Acre will push us further into our understanding of the mission of God. Yes, Heather, I see the vision. Thank you for sharing with me the dreams of God to bless a wounded people.

Stay tuned. We may have the opportunity to host Heather later this fall and in the summer of 2007 to assist the work at God’s Golden Acre by hosting the Zulu Warriors.

Declarations, Announcements and Observations … Known by Our Love … (part 4)

May 18, 2006

The final post in this series may well be a bit of self-indictment. I mentioned my high school experience where the issue between Steve and I was perceived to be a matter of who is going to Heaven (part 2). The preoccupation with who is gong to Heaven seems to have obfuscated the understanding Jesus came to show us how to live. The Sermon on the Mount was not a “manifesto” for living in Heaven. Rather, the words of Jesus on the hillside charged hearers with how to live in the Kingdom of God - NOW. Precious little time was and is given to living the way of Jesus.

We would do well to hear the words of Jesus to the disciples in the great John 17 passage. The world will know you are my disciples by your love for each other. John continues the emphasis in his circular letters (1 John in particular). Jesus did not say his followers would be known by an assurance of Heaven, but in the very love expressed to neighbors, brothers (sisters) and others.

Maybe we should put down the shophar’s horn and live out of the Kingdom of God - NOW! We then may well enjoy the very “making disciples” Jesus commissioned.

The potential self-indictment comes when I realize my need to love neighbors, brothers (sisters) and others.

My apology … Count me in … Memphis on my mind …

May 18, 2006

My recent series - “Declarations, Announcements and Observations” - represents why I have added my name to the Memphis Declaration. For example, I apologize to the leadership and members of the Baptist World Alliance for the way in which the leaders of the SBC acted with regard to our pulling out of the very organization we helped to found. No amount of spin will convince me this was anything but the result of making room for the CBF. I apologize that we looked for uniformity rather than unity. May God continue to bless your work.

Declarations, Announcements and Observations … Thank You For Smoking … (part 3)

May 18, 2006

Nick Naylor, the lead character in the movie, “Thank You For Smoking”, may well be the poster child for spin in America. Spencer and I took in this movie last evening. The past seven months have brought a heightened awareness to “spin” in SBC life. Wade Burleson’s run in with the IMB Trustees was spun like laundry in the washing machine spin cycle. Initially accused of slander, he now awaits possible censure in New Mexico just four weeks from Greensboro and the potential nomination for president of the SBC. His sin - blogging about potential IMB policy changes, or not going along with the good old boys.

Announced with what could have been construed as a “King’s Coronation” at the Jerry Vines’ pastor’s conference, Johnny Hunt withdrew his name for consideration for president of the SBC only to select his replacement and insinuate that to consider anyone else would put one in danger of denying the “supernatural draft.” Talk about spin.

The Florida Baptist Witness comes out with a piece regarding the CP giving of Floyd’s church and Danny Akin comes to the rescue. Now, three SBC seminary presidents have “endorsed” their candidate. Who would vote against the collective of Patterson, Mohler and Akin? Only someone out of touch with the way God is moving in the SBC. Talk about spin.

In the movie, “Thank You For Smoking”, Nick Naylor was asked about how he would convince one person to side with him. He replied, “I am not out to persuade you, but I do want to persuade everyone else.” The reason these significant voices may have come out prior to Greensboro is not to convince the already skeptical and cynical who tire of “king making.” No, the real reason is to convince everyone else the battle for the SBC is not over and someone who has a long standing with the good old boys must be elected to keep the “liberals” at bay. Talk about spin.

Declarations, Announcements and Observations … Drafting a New Identity … (part 2)

May 18, 2006

Innocence may be lost in simple conversations. I learned ministry in a “triumphalist” Southern Baptist Church. We were always better, right and more evangelistic than any other group [read, denomination] - save a couple of cults we regularly used as illustration for committed “soul winning.” I believed.

I am unsure if I communicated the same sentiment as an adolescent. I do recall a specific conversation shared across a drafting table. Certain of a career in architecture I relished the thought of designing and creating homes and buildings. Steve sat across from me for my second drafting class. One day the conversation turned to faith and church. I could not believe my ears when I was accused of belonging to a group who believed we were the only ones going to Heaven. (I may turn this phrase into a third or fourth post in this series.)

I protested. We discussed our respective traditions and the perceptions of our particular group with regard to the other. He was Roman Catholic and I Southern Baptist. I have not forgotten his experience at the hands of other Southern Baptists who sought to convert him because he was Catholic. It was at that point that I knew we had surely overstepped by summarily dismissing an entire segment of the population solely based on their affiliation in Christendom. I also knew the tinge of embarrassment that resulted. I apologized.

Before graduating high school I heard all the arguments by fundamentalists for the need to “take over” the Southern Baptist Convention. The church to which I belonged fell into the fundamentalist vein of the SBC and so was very sympathetic to the perceived “liberal” drift.” No doubt I began to live into the very notion my high school classmate had just a couple of years before decried. This time the recipients of the triumphal arrogance would be those within my own tribe.

“The Heresy Papers” written in regard to my Alma Mater left many attending Oklahoma Baptist University with overly sensitive antennae. Any language emitting the slightest hint of a liberal bent triggered often hostile responses. We did not even really understand the terms being thrown around. We just knew that if you used the right code words you could be trusted. If not, you must have been a “liberal.” The climate disallowed real relationship and honest inquiry. Even today we still suffer these ill effects. People are dismissed because they use words others deem out of bounds. Unfortunately the climate remains the same today.

I have a number of friends in both the emerging church and Emergent movements. Many take scathing diatribes from many in my tribe. I often have to apologize and often leave out the details of my denominational affiliation. I am embarrassed. Pejorative dismissals based on other’s evaluations are intellectually dishonest. And yet, under the guise of preserving the faith we treat people as less than human. I am disgusted. I apologize.

“Winning back” the SBC reinforced not only the external expression of “triumphalism” but created an internal “us” vs. “them” that left one wondering how anyone could consider themselves Christian who did not embrace the “hill on which to die” spun by the “us.” The near recent dismissal of IMB missionaries underscored a “colonialism” stemming from the SBC “triumphalism.” An ever narrowing of cooperation jeopardized the association with the Christian Missionary Alliance and the ministry of Christ followers from differing denominational affiliations. . How on earth would we preserve our “Baptist” distinctives? I apologize.

Natalie commented on the previous post. There is little doubt we have done some amazing things to women in our tradition. Amazing here carries with it the force of “unbelievable.” I guess it is not so unbelievable when you consider our support of slavery, record on racism, homophobic dehumanizations, and again, the way we treat those who do not uniformly agree with our positions. Natalie, I apologize.

Quickly someone will proof text me to death. We will have long conversations about the feminization of the male. We will argue headship, complementarity and egalitarianism. The problem won’t be in the necessity of conversation. Really the issue will be just how we treat real people. We do not do a good job in disagreement. I apologize.

Just today I was asked if I was Southern Baptist. Yesterday I was asked what in the world was going on in our denomination. Sunday a member of our church heard about an upcoming newscast that would talk about the “Baptist Blowup.” I hail from a faith with its own dark history. I apologize. I am still committed to a denomination that for which from time to time apologies need to be made. People matter. Relationships reflect the communality of the Triune God. Redemptive living in the world requires an incarnational expression of the work of Jesus that shows up more in love for my brother than my condemnations. When I am reminded of our less than stellar representations both Christian and Southern Baptist, I apologize.

Blog Lite …

May 16, 2006

Blogging may be light this week. I am out with meetings at Azusa Pacific (meeting with Keith Matthews and attending a workshop around the theme “Spiritual Formation”, Fuller Seminary (Kurt Frederickson) and ETREK planning time with Spencer and Brian. We will also work on plans for Soularize in the Bahamas next May. Glad to know Greg is already planning to attend. I will also get to spend some time with Heather Reynolds and her husband. Heather founded “God’s Golden Acre” (and here) in South Africa. The real fun is hanging out with Alden and Grace. It has been some time and boy how they have grown. Grace will start Kindergarten in the fall! As always Lisa is a gracious host.

Thanks to Natalie and Marty for the encouragemetn to put up part 2 of my previous post. I aim to work on that a bit as I have time and just may get it up before the weekend.

I am glad Patty will be attending the SBC in Greensboro in just a few weeks. Always great to have my best friend with me.

Next Page »

Bottom